US Department of Labor Proposes New Independent Contractor Rule

2.26.2026

On February 26, 2026, the US Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division announced a proposed rule intended to clarify how to determine whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and related federal laws.

Rescission of 2024 Rule; Return to 2021 Framework

The proposed rule would rescind the Department’s 2024 final rule addressing independent contractor classification and replace it with an analysis similar to the approach adopted by the Department in 2021. According to the Department, the proposal aligns with long‑standing Supreme Court and federal circuit court precedent and is intended to make worker classification more predictable for both workers and employers.

Economic Reality Test with Core Factors

The proposed rule applies an 'economic reality' test to determine whether a worker is economically dependent on an employer (and therefore an employee) or is in business for themself as an independent contractor. The rule highlights two core factors: (1) the nature and degree of control over the work, and (2) the worker’s opportunity for profit or loss based on initiative and/or investment.

Additional Factors Considered

In addition to the core factors, the Department identifies other considerations relevant to the analysis, including the amount of skill required for the work, the degree of permanence of the working relationship, and whether the work is part of an integrated unit of production. The proposal emphasizes that the actual practice of the parties is more important than contractual labels or theoretical possibilities when determining worker status.

Expanded Application Beyond the FLSA

The proposed rule would also apply this streamlined classification analysis to the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act (MSPA), both of which rely on the FLSA’s statutory definition of 'employ.'

Illustrative Guidance

The proposal includes eight fact‑specific examples demonstrating how the economic reality factors would be applied in common, real‑world scenarios.

Read the Proposed Rule

The full proposed rule is available here.

Please feel free to contact the authors of this Client Alert or your Butzel attorney for more information.

Brett Miller
313.225.5316
millerbr@butzel.com

Catherine Fleming 
517.372.4382
flemingc@butzel.com

What's Trending

Follow us on social media

Jump to Page

Butzel Long Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek