Department of Labor withdraws informal guidance on joint employment and independent contractor status issued by the Obama Administration

6.8.2017

The Department of Labor announced on Wednesday, June 7, 2017, that it was rescinding two Obama administration rules, one that expanded the "joint employer" doctrine and one regarding independent contractor classification.

What did the prior guidance address?

The joint employer doctrine refers to cases in which a business can be said to effectively control the workplace policies of another company, such as when a company subcontracts to another business. Until 2015, the Department of Labor opined that “joint employment” only applied in cases where the company had "direct control" over the other's workplace. In 2015, the then-Labor Secretary Tom Perez changed that standard to the much more ambiguous "indirect control." Companies, such as franchises and businesses that use Professional Employer Organizations or staffing companies to perform HR and other functions, were concerned under that lesser standard that they may be held liable for workplace violations even if they did not directly oversee it.

In 2016, the Department of Labor also issued guidance relative to independent contractors. This Guidance opined that many workers were being misclassified as independent contractors instead of employees. In so doing, the Guidance abandoned the right of control test and instead, adopted the economics reality test. The guidance further stated that this should be broadly interpreted in favor of finding an employment relationship.

What does this mean to employers?

The withdrawal of the U.S. Department of Labor’s 2015 and 2016 informal guidance on joint employment and independent contractors will benefit many employers. Returning to the pre-Obama administration standards is also seen as a win for many business groups which had opposed the Obama rule.

How does this effect the NLRB’s stance on the joint employment relationship?

The National Labor Relations Board was the first agency to adopt the strict “joint employer” standard and has not rescinded its interpretation. However, newly appointed Chair Phil Miscimarra of the NLRB has repeatedly criticized the application of this new joint employer standard. In addition, President Trump still must pick nominees for the five-member board's two open seats. Hopefully, these two factors will cause the NLRB to follow the DOL’s lead and abandon the broad joint employer standard proposed under the Obama administration.

What should companies do now?

Generally, most companies will not change it business model according to this recent withdrawal. Employers, however, are encouraged to review whether those classified as independent contractors are properly classified, and to seek legal counsel as to the impact of this revocation on its specific operations, business plans and litigation strategies.

Rebecca S. Davies
313.225.7028
davies@butzel.com

Related Services

What's Trending

Follow us on social media

Jump to Page

Butzel Long Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek