Client Alerts

There is a growing rise in trade secret theft in the automotive industry. Fast-paced advances in automated and connected car technologies, as well as other manufacturing and technology advances, coupled with a global marketplace and interconnected supply chain makes the automotive industry ripe for trade secret theft.

The FCC is Seeking to Refresh the Record with Respect to Proposals for Sharing of the Spectrum that had been set aside for Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communications - Comments are Due July 7th

Software development companies breathed a collective sigh of relief in May of 2016.

The Federal Circuit reversed a Central District of California decision that held all patent claims to a “self-referential” database as not patent eligible under 35 U.S.C. §101. The Federal Circuit remanded the case for further proceedings by patent holder Enfish for its ADO.NET product.

We have previously issued a Health Alert on the specific issue of Telemedicine. One of the obstacles in providing telemedicine services has been reimbursement. In order to address this issue at least, in part, we have teamed with Kathy Jo Uecker*. Kathy is very knowledgeable in reimbursement and was pleased to assist in providing information on how providers can be paid for these services.

Ok. You asked for it and you got it: You implemented review based websites, customer portals, message boards, blogs, social media, chat rooms, bulletin board posts, and other applications which enable customers and users to communicate with your business and each other by posting information, comments, messages, images, etc. All you want is for everyone to be happy!!

Background

Many employers encourage employee participation in a wellness program. New final regulations were just issued that change the rules for employers offering employee wellness programs. Changes include expanded restrictions on wellness incentives, additional notice requirements, new prohibitions on employer actions, and new confidentiality requirements.

The desire by physicians and others to leverage their services and those of their staff as well as the consumer demand for greater access to have information about their health is leading the push for patient portals. This push is coming from many sources: patients, health care providers, insurers and regulators. Patient portals include any type of secure online website that provides access to health information or health care professionals from anywhere using an Internet connection. Patient portals can provide any number of benefits including by example, better patient-provider communication, improved workflow, benefits and coverage, making payments, a customized patient engagement and experience, self-service care, remote management of care, behavior changing preventative care and chronic care management, improved quality, meeting various “meaningful use” incentive requirements, research, coordination of care across providers and many other benefits.

On May 18, 2016, the Department of Labor issued its final regulation revising the overtime pay exemption for white-collar employees. It issued the proposed rule in July 2015 and, since September 2015, had reviewed over 270,000 comments from businesses, labor unions, and other members of the public about the proposed regulation.

This morning, in a short unsigned opinion read from the bench by Chief Justice John Roberts, the U.S. Supreme Court vacated and remanded seven Affordable Care Act (ACA) contraceptive mandate cases. Zubik v. Burwell, Case No.14-1418 et al. Bringing its total ACA mandate remands to 13, the Court also issued orders today simultaneously vacating and remanding six additional ACA contraceptive mandate cases to their respective federal Courts of Appeal.

Nearly two weeks ago Butzel Long was one of the first law firms in the nation to announce the passage by both chambers of Congress of the Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016 (the “DTSA”). The DTSA passed with overwhelming support in both houses. Yesterday, President Obama signed the DTSA into law, and the Act is now effective. Below is a recap of what is new and what every company should be looking to do in light of this new law. Specifically, there are new provisions that must be written into every non-compete or other restrictive covenant signed by any employees. Butzel Long can help keep your company up to date and in conformance, and in doing so keep your assets protected.

In an election year, it’s worth nonprofit organizations reviewing the rules about public policy, lobbying, and political activities. Tax exempt nonprofit organizations must be careful about the types of public and political activities they undertake, but a nonprofit organization doesn’t have to give up the ability to take positions on public issues or to take action to influence public policy merely because of its exempt status. Federal tax limits on the political activities of tax-exempt organizations are, in fact, often narrower than many people lawyers think. Tax-exempt organizations have the right to engage in public debate and make their positions on important issues known, and even 501(c)(3) charities, which are the most heavily regulated, may engage in some political activities that further their tax-exempt, charitable purposes.

It is not often that Congress works together, let alone with an overwhelming consensus. But Congress did just that in passing the Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016 (the “DTSA”) in both houses.

In what has become an annual event, during his remarks to over 3,000 healthcare compliance professionals at the HCCA Compliance Institute, on April 18, 2016, Department of Health and Human Services Inspector General Daniel Levinson announced a major regulatory development. This year, Mr. Levinson announced the issuance of revised Guidance for the imposition of permissive exclusions under the OIG’s exclusion authority. The new Guidance, which appears on the OIG’s website and replaces the 1997 version, provides new insight on what the government will look at when deciding to impose an exclusion under section (b)(7) related to civil and administrative healthcare fraud settlements. Under section (b)(7), the OIG presumes that exclusion is appropriate for some period of time for those that have defrauded Medicare or any other Federal healthcare program. The Guidance is designed to identify those circumstances that pose a lower risk to the Federal healthcare programs to rebut this presumption for exclusion, as well as those higher risk areas that support heightened sanctions, including exclusion.

On January 11, 2016, the Federal Trade commission (FTC) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) released a Joint Statement regarding legislation in South Carolina House Bill 3250 (the “Bill”) which would narrow the application and ultimately repeal South Carolina’s Certificate of Need (“CON”) laws. CON laws regulate beds allowed for hospitals and nursing homes as well as numerous other health services such as CT scans, MRIs and surgery centers.

In recent days, hospitals in the Washington/Baltimore corridor have been hit by a spate of ransomware attacks, and there is no reason to believe that these attacks will not expand to include hospitals and other healthcare providers’ systems elsewhere, including in Michigan. Indeed, US-CERT, the U.S. Government’s Computer Emergency Readiness Team, has issued an “Alert” to warn hospitals and other healthcare facilities across the country of the growing threat. While cyber criminals have been using variants of ransomware to extort money for a number of years, the emergence of large-scale targeting of hospitals is a relatively recent development that is particularly pernicious. After all, the effects of a ransomware attack -- which infects a computer network and restricts access to it until a ransom is paid to unlock it -- can be, literally, a matter of life and death because such attacks can block access to the current medical records of critically ill patients. Ransomware attacks also threaten the continuity of operations of healthcare facilities, which could lead to even more horrific results.

Over the last decade, 21 states (including New York and California) have created health claims databases and have imposed substantial and costly health care data reporting requirements upon public and private employers, health care plans, health care insurers, and third-party administrators that provide or pay for health care services. In recent years, 18 more states have moved towards creating such databases (including Michigan, Illinois, and Ohio).

Earlier this year, the Department of Transportation (DOT) and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) issued a Policy Statement earlier this year seeking to foster life-saving automated vehicle technologies: http://www.nhtsa.gov/About+NHTSA/Press+Releases/dot-initiatives-accelerating-vehicle-safety-innovations-01142016

On March 1, 2016, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed two lawsuits against Baltimore and Pittsburgh based companies claiming those employers discriminated against employees based on sexual orientation. This marks the first time that the EEOC has sued a private employer under the theory that “sexual orientation” discrimination is a form of “sex discrimination.” This lawsuit forms a part of the EEOC’s continuing effort to seek judicial recognition for its argument that sexual orientation discrimination is unlawful under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

This alert is different from others that we have previously provided – it is about the future of one of the innovative aspects of health care technology. Specifically, we wanted to alert our subscribers to some of the telemedicine issues, trends and opportunities. We are co-authoring this specific alert with Susie Vestevich, Esq. an advocate for Michigan-based JEMS Telehealth, manufacturer of emergent telemedicine hardware/software solutions. *JEMS provides the available technology to obtain care for patients in emergency situations. Providing quick information to medical professionals can reduce the recovery times for strokes, heart attacks, and other conditions.

Even prior to the passage of the Affordable Care Act, the return to CMS of overpayments to providers was an important issue for healthcare providers. With the passage of ACA, specifically Section 6402(a), repayment became required under a sixty (60) day rule. On February 11, 2016, CMS issued the final rule, addressing the key issues of when the clock starts ticking on the sixty (60) day repayment period, and how far back CMS can go to impose the sixty (60) day reporting period.